Price v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 634 (TC) (09 December 2010)
VAT is refundable under the DIY Scheme only for goods that are 'building materials' as defined by Note 22, Group 5, Schedule 8, VATA and incorporated in the dwelling; roller blinds qualify as such, but VAT on services and incorrectly charged VAT is not refundable.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 634
- Parties
- Appellant: John Price; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Refund Appeal (diy Scheme) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part.
- Legal Topics
- DIY Builders Scheme, Zero Rating, Building Materials, Refund Eligibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Price
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Refund Appeal (diy Scheme) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether VAT charged on certain services and goods is eligible for refund under the DIY Scheme
- 2 Whether roller blinds qualify as 'building materials' under Note 22, Group 5, Schedule 8, VATA
Ratio Decidendi
VAT is refundable under the DIY Scheme only for goods that are 'building materials' as defined by Note 22, Group 5, Schedule 8, VATA and incorporated in the dwelling; roller blinds qualify as such, but VAT on services and incorrectly charged VAT is not refundable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part.
Orders
- VAT refund of £61.47 allowed for roller blinds as building materials.
- Appeal dismissed for VAT claimed on services and incorrectly charged VAT (£712.53).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment