Scofield v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 199 (TC) (24 March 2011)
Section 66(1) Finance Act 2004 confers a discretionary power on HMRC to cancel gross payment status, not a mandatory obligation. The statutory context, drafting, and contrast between 'may' and 'must' throughout the CIS provisions confirm Parliament's intent to confer discretion. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 199
- Parties
- Appellant: John Scofield; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Construction Industry Scheme, Gross Payment Status, Statutory Interpretation, Discretion of HMRC, Compliance Test
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Scofield
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC has discretion to withdraw gross payment status under section 66(1) Finance Act 2004
- 2 Whether HMRC exercised any such discretion
- 3 Jurisdiction of Tribunal to review HMRC decision
Ratio Decidendi
Section 66(1) Finance Act 2004 confers a discretionary power on HMRC to cancel gross payment status, not a mandatory obligation. The statutory context, drafting, and contrast between 'may' and 'must' throughout the CIS provisions confirm Parliament's intent to confer discretion. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to review HMRC's exercise of this discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- HMRC's cancellation of gross payment status is set aside
- Mr Scofield's gross payment status is reinstated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment