National Westminster Bank Plc v Megaline [2006] DRS 3525 (9th May 2006)

National Westminster Bank Plc v Megaline [2006] DRS 3525 (9th May 2006)

The Complainant established rights in the marks NATWEST and NatWest ONLINE, and the domain name is similar to these marks. The Respondent used the domain name to impersonate the Complainant and perpetrate fraud, confusing users and damaging the Complainant's goodwill. No legitimate use was shown by the Respondent. The domain name is therefore an abusive registration and should be transferred to the Complainant.

Citation
[2006] DRS 3525
Parties
Complainant: National Westminster Bank Plc; Respondent: Johnny Megaline
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
Outcome
Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred to Complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Disputes Trade Marks Passing Off Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Westminster Bank Plc

Complainant

Johnny Megaline

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Complainant has rights in a name or mark similar to the domain name
  2. 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the Respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The Complainant established rights in the marks NATWEST and NatWest ONLINE, and the domain name is similar to these marks. The Respondent used the domain name to impersonate the Complainant and perpetrate fraud, confusing users and damaging the Complainant's goodwill. No legitimate use was shown by the Respondent. The domain name is therefore an abusive registration and should be transferred to the Complainant.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld; domain name to be transferred to Complainant

Orders

  • The domain name be transferred to the Complainant