Joiner Cummings v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 606 (TC) (25 November 2010)
The appellant's services constituted exempt intermediary services in relation to the transfer of units in a property unit trust, as the legal and economic reality of the transaction was materially different from a direct sale of property, and the services fell within the wording and purpose of Item 5, Group 5, Schedule 9, VAT Act 1994.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 606
- Parties
- Appellant: Joiner Cummings; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax) / Appeal Against VAT Assessment and Review Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Exemption, Intermediary Services, Property Unit Trusts, Financial Services, Estate Agency Services
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joiner Cummings
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax) / Appeal Against VAT Assessment and Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's services in facilitating the sale of units in a Jersey property unit trust constituted exempt intermediary services under Item 5, Group 5, Schedule 9, VAT Act 1994 or taxable estate agency services.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's services constituted exempt intermediary services in relation to the transfer of units in a property unit trust, as the legal and economic reality of the transaction was materially different from a direct sale of property, and the services fell within the wording and purpose of Item 5, Group 5, Schedule 9, VAT Act 1994.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The VAT assessment is set aside; the appellant's services are exempt from VAT.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment