Joiner Cummings v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 606 (TC) (25 November 2010)
The tribunal held that the transfer of the property to the unit trust fundamentally changed the legal and economic position, creating distinct rights for unitholders. The appellant's services in finding a purchaser for the units constituted exempt intermediary services under Item 5, Group 5, Schedule 9, VAT Act 1994, as the transaction involved the transfer of units conferring rights under a trust, not a direct sale of property. The appellant acted as an intermediary in relation to the transfer of units, which are financial services for VAT purposes.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 606 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Joiner Cummings; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal (first Tier Tribunal Tax) / Final Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Exemption, Intermediary Services, Property Unit Trusts, Estate Agency Services, Financial Services, Stamp Duty Land Tax Avoidance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joiner Cummings
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal (first Tier Tribunal Tax) / Final Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's services in facilitating the sale of units in a Jersey property unit trust constituted exempt intermediary services under Item 5, Group 5, Schedule 9, VAT Act 1994 or taxable estate agency services.
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal held that the transfer of the property to the unit trust fundamentally changed the legal and economic position, creating distinct rights for unitholders. The appellant's services in finding a purchaser for the units constituted exempt intermediary services under Item 5, Group 5, Schedule 9, VAT Act 1994, as the transaction involved the transfer of units conferring rights under a trust, not a direct sale of property. The appellant acted as an intermediary in relation to the transfer of units, which are financial services for VAT purposes.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The assessment to VAT is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment