Jonathan David Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 289 (TC) (28 July 2009)
The Tribunal found that the appellant had a reasonable excuse for the initial late return due to reliance on an accountant who was unexpectedly unavailable for exceptional reasons. However, after receiving the first penalty notice, the excuse ceased, and the appellant unreasonably delayed in remedying the defaults....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] UKFTT 289 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Jonathan David Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Construction Industry Scheme, CIS Penalties, Late Submission of Returns, Reasonable Excuse, Taxes Management Act 1970 S 118(2)
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jonathan David Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late submission of CIS returns under s 118(2) TMA 1970
- 2 Whether penalties for late returns should be set aside
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the appellant had a reasonable excuse for the initial late return due to reliance on an accountant who was unexpectedly unavailable for exceptional reasons. However, after receiving the first penalty notice, the excuse ceased, and the appellant unreasonably delayed in remedying the defaults. Therefore, only the first penalty was set aside; the remaining penalties were confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Penalty of £100 issued on 1 August 2008 set aside
- Penalties totalling £500 issued on 29 August 2008 and 26 September 2008 confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment