Tom Hartley Jnr Limited Mr Thomas Hartley v Jonathan Foxx (Full Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 20949 (14 August 2019)
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting a transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2019] DRS 20949
- Parties
- Complainant: Tom Hartley Jnr Limited; Complainant: Mr Thomas Hartley; Respondent: Jonathan Foxx
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Tom Hartley Jnr Limited
Complainant
Mr Thomas Hartley
Complainant
Jonathan Foxx
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name constitutes an abusive registration
- 2 Whether the complainant has rights in respect of a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting a transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the domain name to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment