Hampstead Bazaar Ltd v Josef Novak (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9853 (17 June 2011)

Hampstead Bazaar Ltd v Josef Novak (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9853 (17 June 2011)

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's registration was found to be abusive, warranting transfer.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9853
Parties
Complainant: Hampstead Bazaar Ltd; Respondent: Josef Novak
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
17 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Transfer Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hampstead Bazaar Ltd

Complainant

Josef Novak

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was registered abusively
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's registration was found to be abusive, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.