JRO Griffiths Ltd v Revenue & Customs (capital allowances - whether warehouse to store potatoes for crisp manufacture is plant) [2021] UKFTT 257 (TC) (12 July 2021)

JRO Griffiths Ltd v Revenue & Customs (capital allowances - whether warehouse to store potatoes for crisp manufacture is plant) [2021] UKFTT 257 (TC) (12 July 2021)

The potato storage facility qualifies as plant under section 11(4)(a) of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 because it performs active functions integral to the appellant's business, not merely serving as premises. As a building or structure, it is excluded unless it falls within List C exceptions; the facility meets...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] UKFTT 257 (TC)
Parties
Appellant: JRO Griffiths Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 July 2021
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Capital Allowances, Plant and Machinery, Silo for Temporary Storage, Cold Store, Interpretation of Capital Allowances Act 2001
Tax Law Capital Allowances Plant and Machinery Silo for Temporary Storage Cold Store Interpretation of Capital Allowances Act 2001

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JRO Griffiths Limited

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 Whether the potato storage facility qualifies as plant for capital allowances under section 11 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001
  2. 2 Whether the facility is excluded as a building or structure under sections 21 and 22 unless it falls within List C exceptions (cold store or silo for temporary storage)

Ratio Decidendi

The potato storage facility qualifies as plant under section 11(4)(a) of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 because it performs active functions integral to the appellant's business, not merely serving as premises. As a building or structure, it is excluded unless it falls within List C exceptions; the facility meets the ordinary meaning of 'silo for temporary storage' and 'cold store', thus qualifying for capital allowances.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Expenditure incurred by the appellant on the potato storage facility qualifies for plant and machinery capital allowances under section 11(4)(a) and List C of the Capital Allowances Act 2001.
  • HMRC's disallowance of capital allowances is overturned.