The Swatch Group Ltd Omega Ltd v Juicy Wan (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 11274 (29 June 2012)

The Swatch Group Ltd Omega Ltd v Juicy Wan (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 11274 (29 June 2012)

The panel found that the complainants had rights in the relevant trademarks and that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive, warranting transfer.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] DRS 11274
Parties
Complainant: The Swatch Group Ltd; Complainant: Omega Ltd; Respondent: Juicy Wan
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Swatch Group Ltd

Complainant

Omega Ltd

Complainant

Juicy Wan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the registration was abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainants had rights in the relevant trademarks and that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainants.