Inspire Financial North East v Julie Tomlinson (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21587 (12 August 2019)

Inspire Financial North East v Julie Tomlinson (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21587 (12 August 2019)

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the domain name was an abusive registration, warranting transfer.

Citation
[2019] DRS 21587
Parties
Complainant: Inspire Financial North East; Respondent: Julie Tomlinson
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 August 2019
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Transfer Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Inspire Financial North East

Complainant

Julie Tomlinson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant had rights in respect of the name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the domain name was an abusive registration, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the domain name to Inspire Financial North East