Iris Nation Worldwide Limited v Julius Andway (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 13482 (09 December 2013)
The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive. The domain name was ordered to be transferred to the complainant.
- Citation
- [2013] DRS 13482
- Parties
- Complainant: Iris Nation Worldwide Limited; Respondent: Julius Andway
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Iris Nation Worldwide Limited
Complainant
Julius Andway
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent's registration is abusive
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive. The domain name was ordered to be transferred to the complainant.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment