Keolis (UK) Ltd v Justin Thomson (Summary Decision _No Action) [2011] DRS 10221 (31 October 2011)

Keolis (UK) Ltd v Justin Thomson (Summary Decision _No Action) [2011] DRS 10221 (31 October 2011)

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive or in bad faith under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2011] DRS 10221
Parties
Complainant: Keolis (UK) Ltd; Respondent: Justin Thomson
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
31 October 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Keolis (UK) Ltd

Complainant

Justin Thomson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent was abusive or in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive or in bad faith under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name