First Strokes Swim Schools Ltd v Lancaster [2008] DRS 6267 (28 November 2008)
FSSSL established sufficient goodwill and distinctiveness in the name 'First Strokes' to have unregistered rights. Ms Lancaster, with knowledge of FSSSL's business, registered and used the domain in a manner likely to confuse customers and disrupt FSSSL's business, constituting abusive registration under the DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2008] DRS 6267
- Parties
- Complainant: First Strokes Swim Schools Limited; Respondent: Kate Lancaster
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
- Outcome
- Domain name to be transferred to the complainant.
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Passing Off, Goodwill, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
First Strokes Swim Schools Limited
Complainant
Kate Lancaster
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the name 'First Strokes' similar to the disputed domain name
- 2 Whether the respondent's registration and use of the domain name constitutes abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
FSSSL established sufficient goodwill and distinctiveness in the name 'First Strokes' to have unregistered rights. Ms Lancaster, with knowledge of FSSSL's business, registered and used the domain in a manner likely to confuse customers and disrupt FSSSL's business, constituting abusive registration under the DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Domain name to be transferred to the complainant.
Orders
- The domain name firststrokes.co.uk is to be transferred to First Strokes Swim Schools Limited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment