Kelco Ltd v Casey [1992] UKEAT 525_90_0810 (8 October 1992)
The Tribunal found material errors in the Industrial Tribunal's reasoning, including misapplication of legal standards regarding the investigation and the role of the dismissing officer, and a failure to apply the correct test for fairness of dismissal. The decision was set aside and the case remitted for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1992] UKEAT 525_90_0810
- Parties
- Appellant: Kelco Ltd; Respondent/cross Appellant: Mr Casey
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decision of Industrial Tribunal set aside; case remitted for reconsideration by a differently constituted Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Contributory Fault
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kelco Ltd
Appellant
Mr Casey
Respondent/cross Appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal and Cross Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of Mr Casey was unfair
- 2 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law in its reasoning
- 3 Whether the reduction for contributory fault was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found material errors in the Industrial Tribunal's reasoning, including misapplication of legal standards regarding the investigation and the role of the dismissing officer, and a failure to apply the correct test for fairness of dismissal. The decision was set aside and the case remitted for reconsideration by a differently constituted Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decision of Industrial Tribunal set aside; case remitted for reconsideration by a differently constituted Tribunal.
Orders
- Case remitted for reconsideration by a differently constituted Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment