Ms M Deacon v Kent County Council (England and Wales : Part Time Workers) [2025] UKET 2303892/2020 (6 August 2025)

The Tribunal found that the claimant was treated less favourably than a comparable full-time worker and that the respondent failed to provide objective justification for the difference in treatment.

Citation: [2025] UKET 2303892/2020
Parties: Claimant: Ms M Deacon; Respondent: Kent County Council
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 06 August 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Part Time Workers, Employment Rights

Employment Law Part Time Workers Employment Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Ms M Deacon

Claimant

Kent County Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant, as a part-time worker, was treated less favourably than a comparable full-time worker contrary to the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant was treated less favourably than a comparable full-time worker and that the respondent failed to provide objective justification for the difference in treatment.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to compensate the claimant for losses suffered as a result of less favourable treatment
Respondent to review its policies to ensure compliance with the Regulations