McCabe v The Commissioner for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX - residence - whether Appellant had ceased to be resident in the UK - application of UK-Belgium DTC) [2022] UKFTT 356 (TC) (30 September 2022)
The appellant did not effect a distinct break in the pattern of his life in the UK during the relevant period. He retained substantial personal, economic, and social ties to the UK, including family, business interests, and continued use of the UK home. Application of the DTC tie-breaker resulted in the appellant being deemed UK resident, as his centre of vital interests remained in the UK. The appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2022] UKFTT 356
- Parties
- Appellant: Kevin McCabe; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Residence, Double Taxation Convention, Capital Gains Tax, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin McCabe
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant ceased to be resident in the UK for tax purposes during the relevant period (2006-07 and 2007-08)
- 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to be treated as non-UK resident under the UK-Belgium Double Taxation Convention (DTC) for the relevant period
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not effect a distinct break in the pattern of his life in the UK during the relevant period. He retained substantial personal, economic, and social ties to the UK, including family, business interests, and continued use of the UK home. Application of the DTC tie-breaker resulted in the appellant being deemed UK resident, as his centre of vital interests remained in the UK. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appellant is held to have remained resident in the UK for the relevant tax years.
- Quantum of tax due is reserved for later determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment