Knowledgepoint 360 Group Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 438 (TC) (30 June 2011)
The payments made by the employee benefit trust to Mrs Adshead were voluntary, discretionary, and not made under any obligation. The trust acted independently of the appellant, and the appellant did not allocate or make the payments, directly or indirectly. The payments were gratuities within the meaning of Regulation 5, and thus disregarded in calculating earnings for NICs. The appeal is allowed.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 438
- Parties
- Appellant: Knowledgepoint 360 Group Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (NIC)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against HMRC Decision on National Insurance Contributions Liability / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- National Insurance Contributions, Employee Benefit Trusts, Gratuities, Employment Related Payments, Social Security (contributions) Regulations 2001
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Knowledgepoint 360 Group Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (NIC)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against HMRC Decision on National Insurance Contributions Liability / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payments made by an employee benefit trust to an employee following the sale of the company constitute 'gratuities' under Regulation 5 of the Social Security (Contributions) Regulations 2001 and are thus disregarded in calculating earnings for NICs purposes
- 2 Whether the appellant indirectly allocated or made the payments to the employee, thus triggering NIC liability
Ratio Decidendi
The payments made by the employee benefit trust to Mrs Adshead were voluntary, discretionary, and not made under any obligation. The trust acted independently of the appellant, and the appellant did not allocate or make the payments, directly or indirectly. The payments were gratuities within the meaning of Regulation 5, and thus disregarded in calculating earnings for NICs. The appeal is allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appellant is not liable to pay primary or secondary Class 1 National Insurance Contributions in respect of the payments made by the No. 1 Trust to Mrs Adshead during the relevant period.
- The appellant is entitled to a refund of secondary Class 1 NICs paid by the trustees in respect of payments made to beneficiaries between 6 April 2002 and 5 April 2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment