Prada S.a. v Kui Li (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 10237 (17 October 2011)

Prada S.a. v Kui Li (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 10237 (17 October 2011)

The complainant established rights in the name 'Prada' and demonstrated that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive. The domain name was ordered to be transferred to the complainant.

Citation
[2011] DRS 10237
Parties
Complainant: Prada S.a.; Respondent: Kui Li
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
17 October 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prada S.a.

Complainant

Kui Li

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name 'Prada'

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name 'Prada' and demonstrated that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive. The domain name was ordered to be transferred to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.