Laser Byte Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme - clawback of payments) [2024] UKFTT 616 (TC) (09 July 2024)
Mr Puttock was not a fixed rate employee under the CJRS rules due to the informal and variable nature of his pay arrangements, and the purported February 2020 pay increase was not effective at that time but was retrospectively reported in March 2020 to increase CJRS entitlement. Therefore, the higher salary should not be included in the reference salary calculation.
- Citation
- [2024] UKFTT 616
- Parties
- Appellant: Laser Byte Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed subject to reduction of assessment
- Legal Topics
- Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, PAYE Reporting, Income Tax Assessment, Employment Status, Reference Salary Calculation, HMRC Clawback
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Laser Byte Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Puttock was a fixed rate employee for CJRS purposes
- 2 Whether the purported February 2020 pay increase should be included in the reference salary for CJRS claims
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Puttock was not a fixed rate employee under the CJRS rules due to the informal and variable nature of his pay arrangements, and the purported February 2020 pay increase was not effective at that time but was retrospectively reported in March 2020 to increase CJRS entitlement. Therefore, the higher salary should not be included in the reference salary calculation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed subject to reduction of assessment
Orders
- The assessment is reduced from £8,357.19 to £7,427.92 under section 50(6) TMA 1970.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment