Le Bistingo Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 524 (TC) (02 October 2013)
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal because the obligation to file VAT returns online arises directly from legislation and not from any HMRC decision; Article 6 ECHR does not confer jurisdiction in tax disputes, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights does not empower the Tribunal to interpret legislation to grant itself jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2013] UKFTT 524
- Parties
- Appellant: Le Bistingo Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / Strike Out Application for Lack of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out for lack of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- VAT Online Filing, Tribunal Jurisdiction, European Convention on Human Rights, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Le Bistingo Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / Strike Out Application for Lack of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against HMRC's notification of mandatory online VAT filing
- 2 Whether the European Convention on Human Rights or EU Charter confers a right to challenge the legislation in the Tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal because the obligation to file VAT returns online arises directly from legislation and not from any HMRC decision; Article 6 ECHR does not confer jurisdiction in tax disputes, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights does not empower the Tribunal to interpret legislation to grant itself jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out for lack of jurisdiction
Orders
- Appeal is struck out under Rule 8(2)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment