Mr A Edwards v Leaderflush Shapland (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2020] UKET 2600104/2018 (3 September 2020)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
- Citation
- [2020] UKET 2600104/2018
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr A Edwards; Respondent: Leaderflush Shapland
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Redundancy, Collective Consultation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr A Edwards
Claimant
Leaderflush Shapland
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay a protective award to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment