Skyscanner Limited v Leanne Mcgloughlin (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21161 (18 April 2019)

Skyscanner Limited v Leanne Mcgloughlin (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21161 (18 April 2019)

The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the registration was abusive; the domain name should be transferred.

Citation
[2019] DRS 21161
Parties
Complainant: Skyscanner Limited; Respondent: Leanne Mcgloughlin
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
18 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Skyscanner Limited

Complainant

Leanne Mcgloughlin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the registration was abusive; the domain name should be transferred.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.