Lebara Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 67 (TC) (14 October 2010)
The Tribunal determined that the interpretation of EU VAT law regarding the supply and redemption of phonecards, and the risk of double taxation or non-taxation due to divergent Member State practices, required clarification from the Court of Justice of the European Union. The matter was referred for a preliminary ruling to resolve whether one or two supplies arise for VAT purposes and how VAT should be applied through the supply chain.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 67 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Lebara Ltd; Respondents: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Reference for Preliminary Ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union
- Outcome
- Reference for preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax (vat), Telecommunications Services, Cross Border Supply, Face Value Vouchers, Reverse Charge Mechanism
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lebara Ltd
Appellant
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Reference for Preliminary Ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale and redemption of phonecards constitute one or two supplies for VAT purposes under Article 2(1) of the Sixth VAT Directive
- 2 Whether the provision of telecommunications services to the End User is a taxable supply for which the place of supply is in the Member State of the supplier
- 3 Whether double taxation or non-taxation arises due to differing Member State practices and the application of the reverse charge mechanism
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined that the interpretation of EU VAT law regarding the supply and redemption of phonecards, and the risk of double taxation or non-taxation due to divergent Member State practices, required clarification from the Court of Justice of the European Union. The matter was referred for a preliminary ruling to resolve whether one or two supplies arise for VAT purposes and how VAT should be applied through the supply chain.
Court Disposition
Reference for preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union
Orders
- The questions set out in the Schedule are referred to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment