The Procter & Gamble Company v Lee Pratt (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16507 (26 October 2015)

The Procter & Gamble Company v Lee Pratt (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16507 (26 October 2015)

The domain name was found to be an abusive registration infringing the complainant's trademark rights, warranting transfer.

Citation
[2015] DRS 16507
Parties
Complainant: The Procter & Gamble Company; Respondent: Lee Pratt
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 October 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Procter & Gamble Company

Complainant

Lee Pratt

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name should be transferred due to abusive registration

Ratio Decidendi

The domain name was found to be an abusive registration infringing the complainant's trademark rights, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of domain name to The Procter & Gamble Company