Jardine Lloyd Thompson UK Holdings Limited v Lee Woodley (Full Decision _Transfer) [2010] DRS 8918 (16 November 2010)

Jardine Lloyd Thompson UK Holdings Limited v Lee Woodley (Full Decision _Transfer) [2010] DRS 8918 (16 November 2010)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark, the domain name was identical or similar, and the registration was abusive. The domain name should be transferred to the complainant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] DRS 8918
Parties
Complainant: Jardine Lloyd Thompson UK Holdings Limited; Respondent: Lee Woodley
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
16 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Transfer of domain name to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jardine Lloyd Thompson UK Holdings Limited

Complainant

Lee Woodley

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the registration of the domain name is abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark, the domain name was identical or similar, and the registration was abusive. The domain name should be transferred to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Transfer of domain name to complainant

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to Jardine Lloyd Thompson UK Holdings Limited