Leigh Day (formerly Leigh Day & Co) v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 425 (TC) (09 May 2014)
Regulation 38 cannot be used to reclaim VAT that was incorrectly charged where there was no underlying VAT liability; it is limited to adjustments for changes in consideration. Leigh Day did not meet the requirements of Regulation 38, as the reduction in consideration was not reflected in its business accounts...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] UKFTT 425
- Parties
- Appellant: Leigh Day (formerly Leigh Day & Co); Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT, Legal Aid, Assessment Procedure, Costs, Limitation Periods
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leigh Day (formerly Leigh Day & Co)
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Regulation 38 of the VAT Regulations 1995 applies to allow refund of incorrect VAT charged to the Appellant
- 2 Whether the letter from HMRC to the Appellant's adviser constitutes a valid notice of assessment under section 73(1) VAT Act 1994
- 3 Whether the Appellant is entitled to repayment of VAT overpaid
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 38 cannot be used to reclaim VAT that was incorrectly charged where there was no underlying VAT liability; it is limited to adjustments for changes in consideration. Leigh Day did not meet the requirements of Regulation 38, as the reduction in consideration was not reflected in its business accounts within the required period. The letter from HMRC dated 19 October 2007, although containing the necessary information for an assessment, was not properly notified to Leigh Day as required by section 73(1) VAT Act 1994, since it was sent only to their advisers and not to the taxpayer directly.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leigh Day’s claim for relief under Regulation 38 is refused
- No valid VAT assessment was notified to Leigh Day under section 73(1) VAT Act 1994
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment