Leigh Day (formerly Leigh Day & Co) v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 425 (TC) (09 May 2014)

Leigh Day (formerly Leigh Day & Co) v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 425 (TC) (09 May 2014)

Regulation 38 cannot be used to reclaim VAT that was incorrectly charged where there was no underlying VAT liability; it is limited to adjustments for changes in consideration. Leigh Day did not meet the requirements of Regulation 38, as the reduction in consideration was not reflected in its business accounts...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] UKFTT 425
Parties
Appellant: Leigh Day (formerly Leigh Day & Co); Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 May 2014
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
VAT, Legal Aid, Assessment Procedure, Costs, Limitation Periods
Tax Law VAT Legal Aid Assessment Procedure Costs Limitation Periods

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leigh Day (formerly Leigh Day & Co)

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Regulation 38 of the VAT Regulations 1995 applies to allow refund of incorrect VAT charged to the Appellant
  2. 2 Whether the letter from HMRC to the Appellant's adviser constitutes a valid notice of assessment under section 73(1) VAT Act 1994
  3. 3 Whether the Appellant is entitled to repayment of VAT overpaid

Ratio Decidendi

Regulation 38 cannot be used to reclaim VAT that was incorrectly charged where there was no underlying VAT liability; it is limited to adjustments for changes in consideration. Leigh Day did not meet the requirements of Regulation 38, as the reduction in consideration was not reflected in its business accounts within the required period. The letter from HMRC dated 19 October 2007, although containing the necessary information for an assessment, was not properly notified to Leigh Day as required by section 73(1) VAT Act 1994, since it was sent only to their advisers and not to the taxpayer directly.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leigh Day’s claim for relief under Regulation 38 is refused
  • No valid VAT assessment was notified to Leigh Day under section 73(1) VAT Act 1994