Jacques v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX - High Income Benefit Charge) [2020] UKFTT 311 (TC) (29 July 2020)
The appellant had a reasonable excuse for failing to notify HMRC of his liability to the HICBC because, as an employee outside the self-assessment regime, he was not on notice of the legislative change, and his ignorance was objectively reasonable in the circumstances. There was no evidence he was specifically notified or should have been aware of the requirement. Ignorance of the law can be a reasonable excuse in such circumstances. No special circumstances were found, but the penalty was not justified due to the reasonable excuse.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT 311 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Leigh Jacques; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal (high Income Benefit Charge Penalty Assessment) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision on Appeal Against Penalty Assessment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- High Income Child Benefit Charge, Penalty for Failure to Notify Chargeability, Reasonable Excuse, Ignorance of the Law, Special Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leigh Jacques
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal (high Income Benefit Charge Penalty Assessment) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision on Appeal Against Penalty Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for failing to notify HMRC of liability to the High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC) for 2016-2017 and 2017-2018
- 2 Whether ignorance of the law can constitute a reasonable excuse in the circumstances
- 3 Whether there are special circumstances justifying reduction of the penalty
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant had a reasonable excuse for failing to notify HMRC of his liability to the HICBC because, as an employee outside the self-assessment regime, he was not on notice of the legislative change, and his ignorance was objectively reasonable in the circumstances. There was no evidence he was specifically notified or should have been aware of the requirement. Ignorance of the law can be a reasonable excuse in such circumstances. No special circumstances were found, but the penalty was not justified due to the reasonable excuse.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The penalty assessment for failure to notify chargeability to HICBC is cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment