Smith v Revenue & Customs (Rev 1) [2010] UKFTT 92 (TC) (24 February 2010)
The tribunal found that the appellant's accountants did not prepare accounts in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, particularly regarding recognition of income and work in progress. The failure to comply with accounting standards constituted negligent conduct, allowing HMRC to raise discovery assessments outside statutory time limits under sections 29 and 36 TMA 1970.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 92
- Parties
- Appellant: Leslie Smith; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Computation of Profits, Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, Negligent Conduct, Discovery Assessments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leslie Smith
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether accounts were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice (GAAP) for tax purposes
- 2 Whether the appellant's accountants' conduct constituted negligence under section 29 and 36 TMA 1970
- 3 Whether HMRC could raise assessments outside statutory time limits due to alleged negligent conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the appellant's accountants did not prepare accounts in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, particularly regarding recognition of income and work in progress. The failure to comply with accounting standards constituted negligent conduct, allowing HMRC to raise discovery assessments outside statutory time limits under sections 29 and 36 TMA 1970.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- HMRC's discovery assessments for the relevant years are upheld
- Appellant's challenge to the assessments is rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment