HPI Limited v Lewis Elliott (Full Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 11299 (03 January 2013)
The complainant demonstrated rights in the name HPI and proved that the respondent's registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy, warranting transfer.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] DRS 11299
- Parties
- Complainant: HPI Limited; Respondent: Lewis Elliott
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Passing Off Trademark Infringement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
HPI Limited
Complainant
Lewis Elliott
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration was abusive
- 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name
- 3 Whether the respondent's registration is unfairly detrimental to the complainant
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant demonstrated rights in the name HPI and proved that the respondent's registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy, warranting transfer.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of domain name to HPI Limited
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment