Symantec Corporation v Limarkson (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15935 (24 June 2015)

Symantec Corporation v Limarkson (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15935 (24 June 2015)

The Panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Transfer of the domain name to the Complainant was ordered.

Citation
[2015] DRS 15935
Parties
Complainant: Symantec Corporation; Respondent: Limarkson
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
24 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Symantec Corporation

Complainant

Limarkson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Transfer of the domain name to the Complainant was ordered.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainant.