Limb Group Of Companies v Baxter & Ors [1993] UKEAT 209_91_3007 (30 July 1993)
The Industrial Tribunal erred by relying on post-dismissal facts to infer the reason for dismissal, rather than focusing on the employer's genuine reason at the time of dismissal. The Tribunal's findings were inconsistent, as it accepted the employer's bona fides but also found redundancy as the reason for dismissal. The appeal is allowed and the matter remitted for rehearing.
- Citation
- [1993] UKEAT 209_91_3007
- Parties
- Appellant: Limb & Co (Goole) Ltd; Respondent: Dock Workers (Applicants)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; matter remitted for rehearing before a different Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Industrial Action, Employment Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Limb & Co (Goole) Ltd
Appellant
Dock Workers (Applicants)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissals of the applicants were by reason of redundancy or industrial action
- 2 Whether the Industrial Tribunal correctly applied the law in determining the reason for dismissal
- 3 Whether the employer's genuine reason for dismissal was established
Ratio Decidendi
The Industrial Tribunal erred by relying on post-dismissal facts to infer the reason for dismissal, rather than focusing on the employer's genuine reason at the time of dismissal. The Tribunal's findings were inconsistent, as it accepted the employer's bona fides but also found redundancy as the reason for dismissal. The appeal is allowed and the matter remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; matter remitted for rehearing before a different Tribunal.
Orders
- Remitted for rehearing before a different Tribunal
- Leave to appeal granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment