Lipton Group Ltd v Cudd (Sex Discrimination: Injury to feelings) [2015] UKEAT 0360_14_1902 (19 February 2015)
The Employment Tribunal made a material error of law by misquoting and misapplying JSB Guidelines in assessing compensation for injury to feelings. The correct assessment, considering the evidence and relevant legal principles, is £9,000, falling within the middle Vento band due to the series of discriminatory...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] UKEAT 0360_14_1902
- Parties
- Appellant: Lipton Group Ltd; Respondent: Claimant (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; original award set aside; compensation reassessed
- Legal Topics
- Pregnancy Discrimination, Constructive Dismissal, Injury to Feelings, Compensation Assessment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lipton Group Ltd
Appellant
Claimant (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the compensation for injury to feelings for pregnancy discrimination correctly assessed?
- 2 Did the Employment Tribunal err in applying Judicial Studies Board Guidelines?
- 3 Should compensation include feelings arising from constructive dismissal linked to pregnancy discrimination?
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal made a material error of law by misquoting and misapplying JSB Guidelines in assessing compensation for injury to feelings. The correct assessment, considering the evidence and relevant legal principles, is £9,000, falling within the middle Vento band due to the series of discriminatory events leading to dismissal.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; original award set aside; compensation reassessed
Orders
- The award of £12,100 for injury to feelings is set aside.
- Compensation for injury to feelings is reassessed and set at £9,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment