List Design Group Ltd v. Douglas & Anor [2000] UKEAT 966_00_1610 (16 October 2000)
There is a real point of law regarding the interaction between the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the Employment Rights Act 1996 that merits a full hearing.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 966_00_1610
- Parties
- Appellant: List Design Group Ltd; Respondent: Mrs Douglas; Respondent: Miss Strickland; Respondent: Miss Fry; Respondent: Mr Faulkner
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- case to proceed to full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Holiday Pay, Working Time Regulations, Employment Rights Act, Limitation Period
Employment Law Holiday Pay Working Time Regulations Employment Rights Act Limitation Period
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
List Design Group Ltd
Appellant
Mrs Douglas
Respondent
Miss Strickland
Respondent
Miss Fry
Respondent
Mr Faulkner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Relationship between Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ss.13, 23, 27 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether the respondents' applications were in time
Ratio Decidendi
There is a real point of law regarding the interaction between the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the Employment Rights Act 1996 that merits a full hearing.
Court Disposition
case to proceed to full hearing
Orders
- Matter to be listed for a half-day full hearing, Category B
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment