Tariquez-Zaman v London Deanery of Postgraduate Medical & Dental Education [2008] UKEAT 0380_07_1402 (14 February 2008)
The Tribunal's findings regarding the Eastern Deanery's minimum score requirement and the operation of the clearing system were not perverse or inadequately reasoned; the award for injury to feelings was appropriate given the facts upheld.
- Citation
- [2008] UKEAT 0380_07_1402
- Parties
- Claimant: Dr Tariquez-Zaman; Respondent: London Deanery
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Remedies Decision Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Victimisation, Race Discrimination, Remedies, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Tariquez-Zaman
Claimant
London Deanery
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Remedies Decision Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal's findings regarding causation and remedies for victimisation were perverse or inadequately reasoned
- 2 Whether the award for injury to feelings was appropriate
- 3 Whether the clearing system operated as described in the guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's findings regarding the Eastern Deanery's minimum score requirement and the operation of the clearing system were not perverse or inadequately reasoned; the award for injury to feelings was appropriate given the facts upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed in part.
Orders
- Respondent to pay Claimant £15,430.72 comprising £7,500 for injury to feelings, £4,000 for psychiatric injury, £2,000 aggravated damages, £1,930.72 interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment