Mr Mirza Ejaz Ali Baig and Mr Asad Haredali v London Underground Ltd (England and Wales : Agency Workers) [2020] UKET 2203674/2012 (30 November 2020)

The Tribunal found that the claimants met the definition of agency workers and had completed the qualifying period, entitling them to the same basic working and employment conditions as direct employees.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2020] UKET 2203674/2012
Parties: Claimant: Mr Mirza Ejaz Ali Baig; Claimant: Mr Asad Haredali; Respondent: London Underground Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 30 November 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Agency Workers, Employment Rights

Employment Law Agency Workers Employment Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr Mirza Ejaz Ali Baig

Claimant

Mr Asad Haredali

Claimant

London Underground Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimants were entitled to employment rights as agency workers under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Respondent to provide claimants with the same basic working and employment conditions as direct recruits after the qualifying period

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.