Mr J Murray v Loomis UK Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2017] UKET 2402102/2017 (22 November 2017)

The tribunal found that Loomis UK Ltd breached the employment contract with Mr J Murray.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2402102/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr J Murray; Respondent: Loomis UK Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 22 November 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract

Employment Law Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr J Murray

Claimant

Loomis UK Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent breached the claimant's employment contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that Loomis UK Ltd breached the employment contract with Mr J Murray.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation for breach of contract

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.