Loughborough University v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKFTT 91 (TC) (06 May 2009)
The reasons stated in support of a taxpayer's override notice under Regulation 102C do not limit the scope or nature of the recalculation of input tax deductible after the existing special method has been overridden; Regulation 102B applies in its own terms regardless of the reasons given.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] UKFTT 91
- Parties
- Appellant: Loughborough University; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (VAT)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax) / Preliminary Issue Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal on preliminary issue dismissed; ruling in favour of the respondents' interpretation.
- Legal Topics
- Partial Exemption, Input Tax Recovery, Special Method Override Notice, Construction of VAT Regulations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Loughborough University
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (VAT)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax) / Preliminary Issue Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reasons stated in a taxpayer's special method override notice under VAT Regulation 102C limit the scope of the recalculation required under Regulation 102B after approval by the Commissioners
Ratio Decidendi
The reasons stated in support of a taxpayer's override notice under Regulation 102C do not limit the scope or nature of the recalculation of input tax deductible after the existing special method has been overridden; Regulation 102B applies in its own terms regardless of the reasons given.
Court Disposition
Appeal on preliminary issue dismissed; ruling in favour of the respondents' interpretation.
Orders
- It is declared that the reasons stated in support of a taxpayer's override notice under Regulation 102C do not limit the recalculation required under Regulation 102B.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment