Youri v. Tower Hamlets & Ors [2001] UKEAT 0987_00_0907 (9 July 2001)

Youri v. Tower Hamlets & Ors [2001] UKEAT 0987_00_0907 (9 July 2001)

The Employment Tribunal correctly applied the law on race discrimination, properly assessed the evidence, and gave adequate reasons for rejecting Mr Youri's claims. There was no error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's findings, and the appeal disclosed no arguable point of law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 0987_00_0907
Parties
Appellant: Louis Youri; First Respondent: London Borough of Tower Hamlets; Second Respondent: Sir John Cass Church of England Secondary School; Third Respondent: Mr Hayden Evans
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing (ex Parte)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Burden of Proof, Comparators in Discrimination Cases
Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Employment Tribunal Procedure Burden of Proof Comparators in Discrimination Cases

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Louis Youri

Appellant

London Borough of Tower Hamlets

First Respondent

Sir John Cass Church of England Secondary School

Second Respondent

Mr Hayden Evans

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing (ex Parte)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in rejecting Mr Youri's claims of race discrimination and less favourable treatment.
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to apply the legal principles from King v Great Britain China Centre and Zafar v Glasgow City Council.

Ratio Decidendi

The Employment Tribunal correctly applied the law on race discrimination, properly assessed the evidence, and gave adequate reasons for rejecting Mr Youri's claims. There was no error of law or perversity in the Tribunal's findings, and the appeal disclosed no arguable point of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed