Mr S Pearson v LTM Group Ltd (Scotland : Breach of Contract : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal : Working Time Regulations : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 4102822/2016 (5 April 2017)

Mr S Pearson v LTM Group Ltd (Scotland : Breach of Contract : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal : Working Time Regulations : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 4102822/2016 (5 April 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that the respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements regarding written statements and working time. The claimant's disclosures qualified for protection under public interest disclosure provisions.

Citation
[2017] UKET 4102822/2016
Parties
Claimant: Mr S Pearson; Respondent: LTM Group Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal, Working Time Regulations, Written Statements
Employment Law Breach of Contract Public Interest Disclosure Unfair Dismissal Working Time Regulations Written Statements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr S Pearson

Claimant

LTM Group Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether there was a breach of contract
  3. 3 Whether there was a protected disclosure under public interest disclosure provisions

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that the respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements regarding written statements and working time. The claimant's disclosures qualified for protection under public interest disclosure provisions.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

  • Respondent to pay compensation to the claimant
  • Respondent to provide written statements as required by law