Nguyen Revenue & Customs (VAT : Registration) [2020] UKFTT 219 (TC) (13 May 2020)
The tribunal found, based on the totality of evidence including CCTV, till rolls, client letters, and oral testimony, that the appellant's average weekly and annual turnover did not exceed the VAT registration threshold in any relevant period. The appeal against registration was therefore allowed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] UKFTT 219 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Ly Nguyen; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Registration Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision on Registration Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Registration Threshold, Taxable Supplies, Assessment of Turnover, Appeal Procedure, Admissibility of Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ly Nguyen
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Registration Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision on Registration Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's taxable supplies exceeded the VAT registration threshold during the relevant period
- 2 Whether HMRC's decision to require VAT registration was justified based on the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found, based on the totality of evidence including CCTV, till rolls, client letters, and oral testimony, that the appellant's average weekly and annual turnover did not exceed the VAT registration threshold in any relevant period. The appeal against registration was therefore allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal against VAT registration is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment