Novomatic AG v Lynn Shen (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16780 (22 December 2015)
The domain name was registered in bad faith and is confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark; transfer is warranted.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] DRS 16780
- Parties
- Complainant: Novomatic AG; Respondent: Lynn Shen
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer granted
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Novomatic AG
Complainant
Lynn Shen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration was abusive
- 2 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant
Ratio Decidendi
The domain name was registered in bad faith and is confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark; transfer is warranted.
Court Disposition
Transfer granted
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to Novomatic AG
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment