Novomatic AG v Lynn Shen (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16780 (22 December 2015)

Novomatic AG v Lynn Shen (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16780 (22 December 2015)

The domain name was registered in bad faith and is confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark; transfer is warranted.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] DRS 16780
Parties
Complainant: Novomatic AG; Respondent: Lynn Shen
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer granted
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Novomatic AG

Complainant

Lynn Shen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration was abusive
  2. 2 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant

Ratio Decidendi

The domain name was registered in bad faith and is confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark; transfer is warranted.

Court Disposition

Transfer granted

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to Novomatic AG