Jaguar Land Rover Limited v M FOTHERGILL (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17827 (20 September 2016)

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the domain name was an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2016] DRS 17827
Parties: Complainant: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Respondent: M Fothergill
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 20 September 2016
Procedural Posture: Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome: complaint denied
Legal Topics: Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement

Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Jaguar Land Rover Limited

Complainant

M Fothergill

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent's registration of the disputed domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the domain name was an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

complaint denied

Orders

No action to be taken regarding the domain name

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.