Jaguar Land Rover Limited v M FOTHERGILL (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17827 (20 September 2016)

Jaguar Land Rover Limited v M FOTHERGILL (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17827 (20 September 2016)

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the domain name was an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17827
Parties
Complainant: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Respondent: M Fothergill
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
20 September 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jaguar Land Rover Limited

Complainant

M Fothergill

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the disputed domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the domain name was an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name