Jaguar Land Rover Limited v M FOTHERGILL (Summary Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 17827 (23 January 2018)

Jaguar Land Rover Limited v M FOTHERGILL (Summary Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 17827 (23 January 2018)

The adjudicator found insufficient evidence to support the complainant's claim and determined that no action should be taken.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] DRS 17827
Parties
Complainant: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Respondent: M Fothergill
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 January 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
no action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jaguar Land Rover Limited

Complainant

M Fothergill

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 whether the respondent's registration of the domain name infringes the complainant's trademark rights

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator found insufficient evidence to support the complainant's claim and determined that no action should be taken.

Court Disposition

no action