Macaw Properties Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 167 (TC) (01 March 2012)

Macaw Properties Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 167 (TC) (01 March 2012)

Macaw formed a bona fide intention to operate a hotel business from the Main House on or around 1 January 2006, supported by objective evidence; intention was not 'pie in the sky' or impossible; VAT registration valid; option to tax issues do not negate intention.

Citation
[2012] UKFTT 167
Parties
Appellant: Macaw; Respondent: HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
01 March 2012
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / Decision in Principle on Intention; Quantum to Be Agreed or Relisted
Outcome
Decision in principle for Macaw; quantum of input tax creditable to be agreed or relisted.
Legal Topics
Input Tax Credit, Economic Activity, Option to Tax, Intention to Make Taxable Supplies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 19
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Macaw

Appellant

HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

VAT Appeal / Decision in Principle on Intention; Quantum to Be Agreed or Relisted

  1. 1 Whether Macaw intended to make taxable supplies for VAT purposes at the time of receipt of supplies
  2. 2 Whether Macaw's VAT registration is valid absent HMRC agreement to option to tax
  3. 3 Whether objective evidence supports Macaw's declared intention

Ratio Decidendi

Macaw formed a bona fide intention to operate a hotel business from the Main House on or around 1 January 2006, supported by objective evidence; intention was not 'pie in the sky' or impossible; VAT registration valid; option to tax issues do not negate intention.

Court Disposition

Decision in principle for Macaw; quantum of input tax creditable to be agreed or relisted.

Orders

  • Parties to agree quantum of input tax creditable; liberty to re-list for further argument if agreement not possible.