Mr S Sparrow v Maklab Ltd (In Liquidation) (Scotland : Breach of Contract : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 4102102/2017 (13 September 2017)

Mr S Sparrow v Maklab Ltd (In Liquidation) (Scotland : Breach of Contract : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 4102102/2017 (13 September 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, that there was a breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and breaches of the Working Time Regulations. The claimant's disclosures were protected under the Public Interest Disclosure Act.

Citation
[2017] UKET 4102102/2017
Parties
Claimant: Mr S Sparrow; Respondent: Maklab Ltd (In Liquidation)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 September 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations
Employment Law Breach of Contract Public Interest Disclosure Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr S Sparrow

Claimant

Maklab Ltd (In Liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether there was a breach of contract
  3. 3 Whether there was a public interest disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, that there was a breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and breaches of the Working Time Regulations. The claimant's disclosures were protected under the Public Interest Disclosure Act.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and breaches of the Working Time Regulations.