Mapcargo Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 217 (TC) (27 March 2013)
The appeal was dismissed because the mismatches and errors in export/import documentation and commodity codes meant that the conditions for Outward Processing Relief and VAT relief were not met. Retroactive authorisation was not available for simplified OPR, and the errors had a significant effect on the operation of the customs procedure, precluding relief.
- Citation
- [2013] UKFTT 217
- Parties
- Appellant: Mapcargo Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Outward Processing Relief, Import VAT, Customs Documentation, Retroactive Authorisation, Commodity Codes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mapcargo Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Outward Processing Relief (OPR) is available when export/import documentation contains errors and mismatches
- 2 Whether VAT relief is available on re-imported goods after repair when documentation is flawed
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the mismatches and errors in export/import documentation and commodity codes meant that the conditions for Outward Processing Relief and VAT relief were not met. Retroactive authorisation was not available for simplified OPR, and the errors had a significant effect on the operation of the customs procedure, precluding relief.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment