Marcus Jason Daniel v The State

Marcus Jason Daniel v The State

Fresh psychiatric evidence raises a credible defence of diminished responsibility based on borderline personality disorder and drug-induced psychosis; interests of justice require the evidence be considered, and the case is remitted for further hearing.

Citation
[2012] UKPC 15
Parties
Appellant: Marcus Jason Daniel; Respondent: The State
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal, Remitted for Further Hearing
Outcome
Case remitted to Court of Appeal for hearing of fresh evidence and further determination.
Legal Topics
Murder, Diminished Responsibility, Fresh Evidence, Mental Health, Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder
Criminal Law Murder Diminished Responsibility Fresh Evidence Mental Health Psychosis Borderline Personality Disorder

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marcus Jason Daniel

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal, Remitted for Further Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether fresh psychiatric evidence supports a defence of diminished responsibility
  2. 2 Whether tactical decisions at trial preclude admission of new evidence
  3. 3 Whether borderline personality disorder and drug-induced psychosis constitute abnormality of mind under the relevant statute

Ratio Decidendi

Fresh psychiatric evidence raises a credible defence of diminished responsibility based on borderline personality disorder and drug-induced psychosis; interests of justice require the evidence be considered, and the case is remitted for further hearing.

Court Disposition

Case remitted to Court of Appeal for hearing of fresh evidence and further determination.

Orders

  • Court of Appeal to hear fresh psychiatric evidence and any further evidence bearing on diminished responsibility.
  • Court of Appeal to decide how to dispose of the appeal after hearing evidence.