Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v Mark Adams T/a 3DWeb Online Services (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 10629 (11 January 2012)

Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v Mark Adams T/a 3DWeb Online Services (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 10629 (11 January 2012)

The complainant established rights in the mark and demonstrated that the domain name was identical or similar and registered in a manner unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights. No response or evidence of legitimate interest was provided by the respondent.

Citation
[2012] DRS 10629
Parties
Complainant: Enterprise Holdings, Inc.; Respondent: Mark Adams T/a 3DWeb Online Services
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
11 January 2012
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Enterprise Holdings, Inc.

Complainant

Mark Adams T/a 3DWeb Online Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the domain name was registered or used in a manner which took unfair advantage of or was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the mark and demonstrated that the domain name was identical or similar and registered in a manner unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights. No response or evidence of legitimate interest was provided by the respondent.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.